Keith, in theory the 5/8 vertical should be 3 db stronger than the 1/4 vertical 
installed in the same position.  A ground plane on top of a house could easily 
be as good or better than a 5/8 wave ground mounted and radiating into the side 
of the house and some trees.  3 db is about 1/2 S unit anyway, so it will not 
be a large difference.  You are correct about the far field conductivity being 
very important in how a vertical antenna will play, whether it is mounted on 
top of a tower or house or ground mounted.  The radials are most important to 
bring up the radiation efficiency, the far field is most important for the take 
off angle.

The 43 foot vertical will have a higher radiation resistance than a shorter 
vertical for all bands, making it easier to get the efficiency up.  It will 
still be lower than 50 ohms for 160, 80 and 60 meters, about 50 ohms for 40 and 
higher for the upper frequencies.  I don't have one because I have a 3 element 
SteppIR with the 30/40 dipole trombone at 21 meters.  I don't think the 43 foot 
vertical will play as well, but they do play well.  I have worked several of 
the Zero-Five offering and they all play well.  I would expect the DXE, Hygain 
and MFJ to play well also, but they are newer and I don't know anyone who has 
one.  All still need a good ground plane and will play much better with 
conductive soil.  

Willis 'Cookie' Cooke 
K5EWJ


--- On Sun, 3/15/09, Darwin, Keith <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Darwin, Keith <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 43' Vertical and the K2 tuner
> To: "James Apple" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Date: Sunday, March 15, 2009, 2:39 PM
> A few years ago, I was really on the 5/8 vertical bandwagon.
>  I thought it was the cat's meow.  The problem was that
> real world A/B testing did NOT show it to be any better than
> a 1/4 wave vert.
> 
> I had a 5/8 wave vert for 15 meters.  Ground mounted over
> 16 radials.  An ATU at the base took care of the small
> impedance mismatch and RG-213 carried the signal to the rig.
>  Hot stuff - or so I thought.
> 
> I also had a 1/4 wave ground plane (4 radials) on the roof
> of my single story house.  It was fed with RG-58.  I spent a
> lot of time with an A/B switch listening to both antennas. 
> You'd think the 5/8 with it's mondo low-angle
> radiation pattern would walk all over the 1/4 wave but it
> DID NOT.  DX signals as the band was just opening or closing
> were sometimes stronger on the 5/8, other times on the 1/4. 
> There was no clear winner.
> 
> It was years before I found the answer.
> 
> Apparently, that wonderful low angle radiation that we want
> out of the 5/8 wave antenna depends HEAVILY on the ground
> conductivity many, many wavelengths away from the antenna. 
> Far out of the reach of any ground radial system, poor soil
> conductivity is sucking the low angle radiation down to near
> zero.  Sure, over salt water it is fabulous, but for the
> vast majority, it just doesn't pan out that way.
> 
> So, for "normal" soil, it seems the best height
> is something less than 1/2 wave.
> 
> I run a 33' vertical with a Hustler 80M resonator on
> top.  It resonates on 80 and 40 and does pretty well on
> those two bands.  It also delivers the goods on 30 meters
> due to the remote tuner.  On 20 meters and higher it
> isn't really all that impressive.
> 
> - Keith N1AS -
> - K3 711 -
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] on behalf of James
> Apple
> Sent: Sun 3/15/2009 9:26 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Elecraft] 43' Vertical and the K2 tuner
>  
> After the ice storm of 2009, I'm looking for an new
> antenna.  I've
> been considering the 43' verticals by DXE,HyGain and
> MFJ.  But I'm not
> sure if my K2 tuner will have the range needed.  The DXE
> site has a
> warning about internal tuners.  Anyone using a K2 and a
> 43' vertical ?
> how's it play ?
> 
> Thanks in Advance
> 
> - Jim (WB1DOG)
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to