election-methods-electorama.com  

Messages by Date

• 2005/03/17 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/03/17 [EM] Full Majority as Part of Strong Defeat Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/17 [EM] Raynaud Chris Benham
• 2005/03/17 Re: [EM] Kevin, 17 March, '05, 0320 GMT Kevin Venzke
• 2005/03/17 Re: [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy. Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/17 Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/17 Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/17 Re: [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy. Juho Laatu
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots Bart Ingles
• 2005/03/16 [EM] 2nd Kevin reply on 17 March GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Kevin, 17 March, '05, 0320 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Re: Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/16 [EM] a name for random ballot from P Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Re: Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] Total Approval Ranked Pairs Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem [email protected]
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Forest's Random Ballot among the candidates not strongly beaten (was: How to describe RAV/ARC) Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Ted Stern
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] least additional votes Juho Laatu
• 2005/03/16 [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Chris Benham
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/16 Re: [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC Ted Stern
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Triangle plotter available if anyone would like it Kevin Venzke
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes) Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: least additional votes Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/15 [EM] How to describe RAV/ARC Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] Re: San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9 Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9 Greg Dennis
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] About random election methods Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/15 [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Ted Stern
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it) Ted Stern
• 2005/03/15 [EM] San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9 Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Ted Stern
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] About random election methods, CDTT,RB Kevin Venzke
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] About random election methods Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it) Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] About random election methods Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/15 [EM] majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes) James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/15 Re: [EM] Round Robins Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/15 [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
• 2005/03/14 [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] publicly acceptable election methods James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet proposals James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/14 [EM] visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it) Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet proposals MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] About random election methods Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] Round Robins Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/14 [EM] "spoiler effect" argument James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: About random election methods Andrew Myers
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] sequential dropping James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 RE: [EM] Round Robins Gervase Lam
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/14 [EM] least additional votes Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Ted Stern
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] About random election methods Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/14 [EM] About random election methods Andrew Myers
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs (Was "Re: Ted's Total Approval Beatpath") Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Automatic gerrymandering Michael A. Rouse
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election Fan de Condorcet
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election Fan de Condorcet
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Ted Stern
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Ted Stern
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Round Robins pass 2 Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] Round Robins Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Total Approval Ranked Pairs (Was "Re: Ted's Total Approval Beatpath") Ted Stern
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/14 [EM] sequential dropping Chris Benham
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Kevin Venzke
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Approval Voting & Spoiler Effect Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/14 [EM] correction James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Chris Benham
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] sequential dropping James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/14 [EM] majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 [EM] sequential dropping Chris Benham
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] sequential dropping James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/14 [EM] Re: least additional votes method (was "first wave Condocet versions...") Juho Laatu
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet methods for public elections James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 [EM] least additional votes method (was "first wave Condocet versions...") James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/14 Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election Juho Laatu
• 2005/03/13 Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Russ, 14 March, '05, 0700 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet methods for public elections MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/13 RE: [EM] Round Robins Paul Kislanko
• 2005/03/13 RE: [EM] Round Robins Alex Small
• 2005/03/13 RE: [EM] Round Robins Paul Kislanko
• 2005/03/13 RE: [EM] Round Robins Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/13 Re: [EM] Round Robins Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/13 RE: [EM] Round Robins Paul Kislanko
• 2005/03/13 Re: [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Round Robins Alex Small
• 2005/03/13 RE: [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR) Paul Kislanko
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR) Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR) Jan Kok
• 2005/03/13 Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/13 Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular RLSuter
• 2005/03/13 Re: [EM] Equal Rankings in Real World Voting Systems Gervase Lam
• 2005/03/13 [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/13 [EM] Why Condorcet should be more popular than IRV (was: Why IRV is popular) Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/12 Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/12 [EM] sequential dropping James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/12 Re: [Fwd: [EM] Approval/Condorcet] Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/12 Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Yes, the Approval loser can be the CW. Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/12 Re: [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Ted's Total Approval Beatpath Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/12 Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular Alex Small
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Re: Approval cutoff AKA "None of the Below" Ted Stern
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Ted Stern
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Why IRV is popular Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Re: Approval cutoff AKA "None of the Below" Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Ramon Llull method = ? Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/12 Re: [EM] Ramon Llull method = ? Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Ramon Llull method = ? James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/12 [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/12 Re: [EM] Markus, 12 Mfarch, '05, 0315 GMT Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/11 [EM] Russ, 12 March, '05, 0645 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/11 [EM] Markus, 12 Mfarch, '05, 0315 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/11 [EM] Approval/Condorcet Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/11 [EM] Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/11 Re: [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/11 Re: [EM] Markus, 11 March, 0240 GMT Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/10 Re: [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc. Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/10 Re: [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/10 [EM] Markus, 11 March, 0240 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/03/10 Re: [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc. Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/10 [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc. Ted Stern
• 2005/03/10 [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise Chris Benham
• 2005/03/10 Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Daniel Bishop
• 2005/03/10 Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/10 Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Daniel Bishop
• 2005/03/09 Re: [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/09 Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/09 Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data bql
• 2005/03/09 [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise Ted Stern
• 2005/03/09 [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/09 Re: [EM] Re: chain climbing methods Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/09 [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/09 [EM] Re: is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Diana Galletly
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Bart Ingles
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Daniel Bishop
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Markus Schulze
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Bart Ingles
• 2005/03/08 [EM] IRV Failures Chris Benham
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] publicly acceptable election methods Kevin Venzke
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/08 [EM] is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient? Chris Benham
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] IRV Failures James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/08 [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
• 2005/03/08 Re: [EM] publicly acceptable election methods Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/08 [EM] is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient? James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/07 Re: [EM] publicly acceptable election methods James Green-Armytage
• 2005/03/07 [EM] publicly acceptable election methods Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/07 Re: [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Kevin Venzke
• 2005/03/07 [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes" Russ Paielli
• 2005/03/07 Re: [EM] Ballot integrity (Was 'Re: "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion') Dave Ketchum
• 2005/03/07 Re: [EM] Re: chain climbing methods Forest Simmons
• 2005/03/07 [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/07 Re: [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Kevin Venzke
• 2005/03/07 [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/03/07 Re: [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Kevin Venzke

• Earlier messages
• Later messages