On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:20 AM, James Gilmour > > If I have understood the various submissions correctly, the principal > objection to IRV on THIS ground, is that the ballot papers of > voters who express different numbers of preferences are thereby treated > differently, and in such a way and to such an extent that > these differences should render the IRV voting system "unconstitutional".
False. That is not the only concern, but one of several obvious inequities in the IRV counting method, but I do not have time currently to continue this discussion on this list. Kathy ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
