election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Scoring (was Re: OpenSTV 2.1.0 released) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] SITC vs [what?] Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] OpenSTV 2.1.0 released and new OpaVote features Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] OpenSTV 2.1.0 released and new OpaVote features Juho Laatu
• [EM] Conclusion--MJ Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] MJ, Approval, Score, and Chicken Dilemma Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MJ SFR (preliminary). Score vs Approval, based on considerations discussed. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ SFR (preliminary). Score vs Approval, based on considerations discussed. Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] MJ SFR (preliminary). Score vs Approval, based on considerations discussed. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ SFR (preliminary). Score vs Approval, based on considerations discussed. Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] MJ SFR (preliminary). Score vs Approval, based on considerations discussed. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ SFR (preliminary). Score vs Approval, based on considerations discussed. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Sorry--1 more thing: SFR formula vs subjective SFR Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Just one more thing about Chicken Dilemma Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clarification Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] SFR as f(Ub, p(config)). Sincere rating. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Trie structure for ballots Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Majority Judgment Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] Majority Judgment Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] MJ: Worse Chicken Dilemma than Approval or Score, elaborate bylaws, computation-intensive count. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Consociational PR Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Consociational PR Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Consociational PR Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Consociational PR Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Consociational PR Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Consociational PR Raph Frank
  • [EM] VoteFair software negotiation tool, works for filling cabinet positions Richard Fobes
• [EM] Symmetrical ICT program with missing line included Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Summary of some of my suggestions at EM Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Deliberation and voting Michael Allan
• [EM] Misunderstood purpose of suggested test Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Symmetrical ICT program, with errors fixed Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical ICT program, with errors fixed Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical ICT program, with errors fixed Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical ICT program, with errors fixed Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical ICT program, with errors fixed Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical ICT program, with errors fixed Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical ICT program, with errors fixed Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical ICT program, with errors fixed Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Error found. Program re-posted with error fixed. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Symmetrical ICT count-program pseudocode Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] History of postwar election reform Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] Proportional representation method where additional voters do not change result Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] minguo presidential poll with direct links Augustin
  • Re: [EM] minguo presidential poll with direct links Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] minguo presidential poll with direct links Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] constantly improving, serving the community - Re: minguo presidential poll Augustin
  • [EM] Constantly improving, serving the community Michael Allan
• [EM] Omission in SFR assumptions Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Formulas for strategic fractional rating (SFR) Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Score MCA, or MCA Score Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Score MCA, or MCA Score Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Score MCA, or MCA Score Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] ICT and Approval presidential poll results so far. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Dropping IC-Smith-T and iC-Schwartz-T Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Reference for poll where experts endorsed approval? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Reference for poll where experts endorsed approval? Rob LeGrand
• Re: [EM] What it takes to give meaning to a criterion "failure" Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] What it takes to give meaning to a criterion "failure" Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] What it takes to give meaning to a criterion "failure" Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] What it takes to give meaning to a criterion "failure" Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] ICT doesn't meaningfully fail CC. CC isn't meaningfully incompatible with FBC. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] ICT doesn't meaningfully fail CC. CC isn't meaningfully incompatible with FBC. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] IC-Smith-T, IC-Schwartz-T, Double-Ended IC-Smith-T, Double-Ended IC-Schwartz-T Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] More complete posting of FBC versions. Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Simpler, obvious, easily-used FBC, directly describing the relevant basic property Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Simpler, obvious, easily-used FBC, directly describing the relevant basic property Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Small addtion to FBC4 & FBC5 Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Stronger FBC met by Double-Ended ICT Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Double-ended ICT? That bottom-end feature is what I used to call "Power Truncation". Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Announcing a rank-balloting 2012 presidential poll at Democracy Chronicles Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A correction for nonuniform distribution. Two clarifications of previous posting. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A deletion and a typo-correction for my previous post. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MJ rules expressed in Bucklin terminology Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MJ rules expressed in Bucklin terminology Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] MJ rules expressed in Bucklin terminology Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Taylor or McLaurin polynomial for the complicated functinos would reduce the numerical work. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Taylor or McLaurin polynomial for the complicated functions would reduce the numerical work. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Taylor or McLaurin polynomial for the complicated functions would reduce the numerical work. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Taylor or McLaurin polynomial for the complicated functions would reduce the numerical work. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Taylor or McLaurin polynomial for the complicated functions would reduce the numerical work. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Various ways of judging bias and approaches to eliminating it Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Various measures of bias and approaches to eliminating it Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Replies to Warren's apportionment webpag, in which I am featured. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Bias-Free (BF) is the unbiased divisor method for uniform probability-density Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho: Seat% and vote%--What I mean by "unattainable". Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho: Seat% and vote%--What I mean by "unattainable". Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Juho: Seat% and vote%--What I mean by "unattainable". Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho: Seat% and vote%--What I mean by "unattainable". Juho Laatu
• [EM] n% of seats for n% of votes is unattainable. LR can't do it either. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] n% of seats for n% of votes is unattainable. LR can't do it either. Juho Laatu
• [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
  • [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] [MG] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Ed Pastore
  • [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] [MG] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Ed Pastore
  • [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Peter Zbornik
  • [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Peter Zbornik
  • Re: [EM] [MG] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Ed Pastore
  • [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
  • [EM] Public parties: a Trojan Horse in the party system Michael Allan
• [EM] Kristofer: Small correction Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Allocation bias summary Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Raph: Sainte-Lague. Transfers in party-list PR. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Raph: Sainte-Lague. Transfers in party-list PR. Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Raph: Sainte-Lague. Transfers in party-list PR. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Raph: Sainte-Lague. Transfers in party-list PR. Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Raph: Sainte-Lague. Transfers in party-list PR. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Raph: Sainte-Lague. Transfers in party-list PR. Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Raph: Sainte-Lague. Transfers in party-list PR. Juho Laatu
• [EM] Oops! I said it backeards. LR's overall-counted s/q are more equal in Raph's example. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Better runoffs Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Better runoffs Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Better runoffs Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Better runoffs robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Better runoffs Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Better runoffs Peter Zbornik
  • Re: [EM] Better runoffs Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Better runoffs Peter Zbornik
• [EM] A few clarifications about allocation bias, and SL vs LR Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The Sainte-Lague index and proportionality Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Interpolation revisions, detail clarification Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Correlation testing and maybe improvement thereby Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Weighted Webster,contd. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Ok, the expected population isn't a+p1/2 Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Methods with more nearly perfect unbias Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho: Bias Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sainte-Lague vs d'Hondt for party list PR Michael Ossipoff

• Earlier messages
• Later messages