Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > I'm concerned that it will make typing normal text more onerous. Right > now, org is quite non-intrusive in most of my writing yet is quite rich > in what it can encode. Having to backslash symbols that I use in text > quite often (especially square brackets) would be annoying. Maybe I > misunderstood; if so, I apologise for the noise!
This is also my concern. I don't want to add complexity to typing in Org, at all. Yet, if this feature is correctly defined, this should disambiguate some annoying situations (e.g., [1] when you do not want a footnote reference). > Regarding citations, I have not played with the -wip branch at > all. Maybe I should. It just wasn't clear where that branch had got to > and whether it was at a point worth trying. Can you (or somebody else) > update us with a summary of what is possible? I cannot. I just implemented the syntax. Others implemented tools on top of it. I don't know the current state of this. Regards,
