Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes:
> - There is a difference between citations as done by latex/bibtex/etc.,
>   and those done in every other format (handled through CSL).  Assuming
>   latex users want to keep their native processing rather than
>   delegating to CSL, we need to solve the myriad small inconsistencies
>   between these two tools.  I think this is an area where it’s important
>   to get things right: users of citations generally have exacting
>   requirements.  “Approximately Chicago-style” or “almost MLA” aren’t
>   worth anything.

In my recollection, pandoc can juggle between CSL and biblatex. From the
pandoc manual:

| --biblatex
|    Use biblatex for citations in LaTeX output. This option is not for
|    use with the pandoc-citeproc filter or with PDF output. It is
|    intended for use in producing a LaTeX file that can be processed with
|    pdflatex and bibtex or biber.

Perhaps someone with more experience of pandoc could assess how well it
toggles between CSL and biblatex, especially for more complicated styles
(e.g., Chicago). 


Reply via email to