Ken Mankoff <> writes:

> Yes, I meant to write that I think Org syntax is maybe *not*
> context-free, and therefore EBNF can't capture all of it. But it could
> still be very helpful and capture most of it.

I'm not arguing about the usefulness of a partial EBNF description. I'm
merely pointing out that the syntax is not context-free. Here is an

    # This is a comment (1)

    # This is not a comment (2)

AFAICT, you cannot distinguish between lines (1) and (2) with EBNF.


Reply via email to