Hi Adam, Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> writes:
> The "C-M-RET" binding doesn't feel quite right to me. Using "shift" > feels like a mnemonic for "sub", whereas "C-M" seems like it should do > something much less frequently used, since it requires two > modifiers. I agree that S- suggests "sub". I've been playing around with C-RET, M-RET, S-RET and I do believe there is room for improvement here, along with a dedicated keybinding for `org-insert-subheading/subitem'. I will refine my proposal later on. > Ihor also made some good points in his message about the combinations > of commands to insert before/after, with/without TODO, etc, and that > "M-<RET> <TAB>" is already a quick way to insert a subheading (I > wasn't aware of the option > `org-cycle-level-after-item/entry-creation'). So maybe this idea of > mine isn't as important as I thought. :) Even if we end up not binding a new key for `org-insert-subheading', it will be good to add org-clone-item and org-insert-subitem and perhaps to improve bindings in this area. I will think again about this. Thanks! -- Bastien
