Jack Kamm <jackk...@gmail.com> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > >>> My concern is that advising `ess-request-a-process' would cause >>> maintenance burden on ob-R. It would require some knowledge about the >>> ESS internals to maintain properly. >> >> Not really. I only meant writing an advice iff our request is accepted >> by ESS devs. Then, all we need is to advice the earlier versions of ESS >> and remove the advice after the new ESS release (we only support the >> latest release of the optional third-party packages: >> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html#emacs-compatibility). No >> changes to advice will be needed in future. >> >> I plan to propose a patch for ESS soon and see if it is going to be >> accepted. > > In that case, this sounds great. Hope the ESS devs are receptive!
Applied, onto main, fixing the oversight in org-src-associate-babel-session (now, it does not require session running). https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=319563cef Since ESS already released a new version with my patch for ESS included, no advice is needed. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>