Jack Kamm <jackk...@gmail.com> writes:

> Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes:
>>> My concern is that advising `ess-request-a-process' would cause
>>> maintenance burden on ob-R. It would require some knowledge about the
>>> ESS internals to maintain properly.
>> Not really. I only meant writing an advice iff our request is accepted
>> by ESS devs. Then, all we need is to advice the earlier versions of ESS
>> and remove the advice after the new ESS release (we only support the
>> latest release of the optional third-party packages:
>> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html#emacs-compatibility). No
>> changes to advice will be needed in future.
>> I plan to propose a patch for ESS soon and see if it is going to be
>> accepted.
> In that case, this sounds great. Hope the ESS devs are receptive!

Applied, onto main, fixing the oversight in
org-src-associate-babel-session (now, it does not require session

Since ESS already released a new version with my patch for ESS included,
no advice is needed.

Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>

Reply via email to