Le 22/11/2014 20:26, Rasmus a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> First, Thierry, I think this patch fixes the second misbehavior you
> observed.

Fixed!

I was wondering, is there any reason why the new inserted keyword is
UPPERCASED?
If not, maybe it would be better to keep the oriGiNaL cASe.


Reply via email to