Hi, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> Still, I think overload M-RET is more intuitive, > > "Intuitiveness" is in the eye of the beholder... Clearly. > Maybe some users will not find intuitive that M-RET usually inserts a > headline... unless it is in a plain list, in which case it inserts an > item... oh wait, if it is at a keyword it can duplicate it... but, > wait, it doesn't happen for every keyword... ah! and in source blocks > it... Not to forget tables. . . >> but I fear our opinions will fail to converge. > > If you want to convince me, show me that this binding makes Org simpler > to use, or, at least, equally simple. Until then, I stand on my ground. This is a Sisyphean task. Even if a number of participants of this ML would chime in, we would still not know whether it would confuse or benefit new users. >From my point of view, we can make every function tied to M-RET beyond `org-insert-headline' configurable and turned off by default. This may, however, also add confusion ("why did M-RET work in X's Org but not in mine..."). At this point, I doubt I can add novel, useful inputs to the discussion. Cheers, Rasmus -- And I faced endless streams of vendor-approved Ikea furniture. . .