On Tuesday, 28 Jul 2015 at 10:07, Oleh Krehel wrote:


> Look here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GNU_General_Public_License&section=11#Libraries
> Most useful quote:
>> The Free Software Foundation (which holds the copyright of several
>> notable GPL-licensed software products and of the license text itself)
>> asserts that an executable which uses a dynamically linked library is
>> indeed a derivative work. This does not however apply to separate
>> programs communicating with one another.


thanks for this link and excerpt.  I could argue that the key word in
the excerpt is "executable".  I cannot see how code written in elisp
itself would need to be GPL.  Distributing it *with* emacs would
probably require it being GPLed but the source code itself, if not based
on already GPLed code, should be fine, e.g. in the context of a

Anyway, I think we've beaten this to death already.  Time to get real
work done! :-)

: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs, Org release_8.3beta-1293-g985420

Reply via email to