On Saturday, July 13, 2002, at 01:39 PM, David Groover wrote:
> Yep, I just got the skinny on the problem. I called Earthlink to see what
> they send to Windows users. He recently switched to Earthlink and
> installed their software. Before that their wasn't a problem. I wasn't
> entirely sure what that meant but now I see that Earthlink does indeed
> offer their own version of a mail and web client. It sounds roughly akin
> to Netscape communicator with web and mail rolled into one window. Not
> really my cup 'o tea. And no, according to the tech support guy, it dose
> not have an option to turn off the HTML coding.

David,

I am absolutely dumbfounded -- David, you are right though there is a bit 
more to the story as I unearthed it out just now with Earthlink.

Earthlink's software 5.0.7 in fact has no way to NOT send HTML email. That'
s right, "formatted email" (i.e., HTML) cannot be turned off in Earthlink 
5.0.7 software.

However, here's the good news and the bad news. Earthlink 5.0.7 software 
is short-lived and is being superseded by Earthlink 2003 for Windows 
software which most definitely does have the ability to send plain-text 
email though HTML is the default setting. Earthlink 2003 for Windows 
software is presently available for download -- that's the good news. The 
bad news is that it is ONLY available via download right now and the CD is 
not scheduled for availability until late September.

Apparently no one at Earthlink with enough clout and savvy was aware of 
the fact that many email lists do not accept posts when the email is HTML.
  Period. Paragraph. No Way. Nada. Forget it. Such emails are simply 
bounced! I suppose only a limited number of users of Earthlink 5.0.7 
software will try to post to the email lists that do not accept HTML email 
but even a few is too many! I'm sure not many list moms will be aware of 
this bizarre situation and will be rather curt with these poor unfortunate 
folks who made a mistake by getting a Windows machine and then compounded 
that mistake with Earthlink 5.0.7 software.

Thus, the only way out of the morass is for some fairly knowledgeable and 
adept person to download Earthlink 2003 for Windows software, burn a CD 
and do the Good Samaritan thing of installing it for those needy Windows 
users who require this kind of help.

I was not able to learn if there are any gotchas involved with installing 
Earthlink 2003 for Windows on top of Earthlink 5.0.7.

I by nature do not believe in conspiracy theories, I find reality bizarre 
enough all by itself. However, in this case I'd be willing to make an 
exception since Earthlink's browser and email software package is 
presumably turnkey from Netscape which is part of AOL-Time Warner. Hmmmmm,
  now isn't it an interesting coincidence that AOL and Earthlink are 
competitors?


   ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Lehnert Riegel
+ Dana Point, California USA
+ 33�28'25"N 117�42'33"W elev 283 ft.
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ -7/8 UT (daylight/standard)
   ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  or  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to