Chris Radek wrote: >On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:24:53PM -0600, Jon Elson wrote: > > > >>I'm trying to refine the sequence. It does seem to require an aborted move. >>OK, so this is a refined sequence that I tested at least once and got it ot >>do what I didn't want. >> >>in manual, use TkEmc GUI right mouse click to set X, Y and Z to some >>setting. Run a program that moves X and Y, and abort it. Now, with XY >>position not at (0,0) jog Z and then right click on Z to set that axis. >>The X and Y axes will go back to default, even though the work offsets >>displayed above the axis positions will still show that offset. >> >> > >I just checked in an experimental fix on the CVS trunk. On abort it >unapplies the work offset, like M2, and makes the display correct. If >you want the G92 offset reapplied, you can get that with MDI G92.3, >and then you can right click and set new offsets like usual. PLEASE >test this, and soon, so if it's right we can put it in the first 2.1 >release. > > > Well, this change seems to perform in a clearly defined manner, and maybe that is the best we are going to be able to do. Axis does much better, and I ran the same test procedure with it. So, I guess this is ready for the 2.1 release.
I just have to force myself to start using Axis. I have gotten too comfortable with tkemc over the last 8 years, despite all the flaws. Thanks, Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
