Am 09.11.2011 um 21:58 schrieb Chris Radek: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:50:55AM +0100, Michael Haberler wrote: >> >> Is it worth doing such a restricted jog mode? It would solve my >> problem but I'd be interested to here what other folks think about it >
Chris, I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing. Assume a manual toolchange. Spindle moved to toolchange position, you change tools, then you'd jog to close to the switch. You'd do that with jog buttons, or a pendant. Then hit a button, procedure continues with next statement, the probe. I'm unsure where 'programming a move/moving out of the way/back' would come in here. How you'd do this with minimum pain? I'm all ears for an easy solution, which 'Jog during Pause' obviously isnt -m > If you know, at a certain point in the program, the tool (or whatever) > needs to be moved out of the way and then back, you could just program > the motion. I really don't see what you will gain here, except a lot > of complexity that doesn't really solve the underlying problem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
