On May 6 2013 10:50 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Kent, Ebo,
>
> Am 07.05.2013 um 02:59 schrieb Kent A. Reed 
> <[email protected]>:
>
>> On 5/6/2013 5:00 PM, EBo wrote:
>>> does anyone remember the paper that was posted to the group that
>>> measured the loss in torque as a function of speed and jitter?  
>>> That
>>> might give us a more principled start to develop guidelines.  As a 
>>> note,
>>> when you get anywhere close to the jitter threshold the apparent
>>> acceleration/deceleration is greater than what the motor can 
>>> handle.
>>>
>>>    hope that helps.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ebo:
>>
>> You may be thinking of this 2001 SPIE paper:
>>
>> Frederick M. Proctor and William P. Shackleford, "Real-time 
>> Operating
>> System Timing Jitter and its Impact on Motor Control", Proceedings 
>> of
>> the SPIE Sensors and Controls for Intelligent Manufacturing II, Vol.
>> 4563, pp. 10-16, October 28, 2001.
>>
>> Nevermind the SPIE paywall. NIST provides a pdf copy at
>> http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=824455
>>
>> This is the work I alluded to in my earlier email.
>
>
> I think it would be a very useful study topic (and a paper worth
> publishing) to start with this work, and go a step further
>
> a sketch for the work based on the above I would find interesting in
> general and very relevant to the discussions here:
>
> - the question I would care about is 'what is the incidence to loose
> steps, given a certain load, and a certain noise distribution in the
> stepping signal'
> - start by measuring actual noise (latency profiles) of currently
> used RT OSes, including a vanilla kernel
> - create a signal generator can load and regenerate noise profiles
> (better not based on linuxcnc but hardware, say a microcontroller)
> - create a setup of stepper motor(s), a hires encoder, and a DC motor
> with a controllable load (eg switchable shunt resistors or somesuch)
> - come up with a way to detect lost steps based on input signal and
> encoder signal
> - automatically run various speed, noise and load profiles and
> qualify them by 'lost steps' incidence
>
> I think the result of such a study could provide fact-based answers
> to what latency in a soft-stepper context actually means, and that be
> very valuable
>
> Note this does _not_ address the (IMO more interesting) question how
> latency impacts 'path tracking quality' of a real and complete
> motion/pid etc servo setup; that would be worth a separate attempt,
> probably more based on control theory than measurements plus some
> verification
>
> no junior researchers out here itching to publish?
>
> - Michael
>
> ps: on the question of shunt resistors - Amit's company might have
> some scalable answers here, but Amit better explain their business
> himself ;)

publishing?  What is the target journal or outlet.  Maybe one of the 
academics can convince a student to take it on.  It would take a lot to 
really make this publishable in a peer reviewed journal/conference.

   EBo --


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and 
their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed 
leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. 
Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to