On 5/24/2013 12:18 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 24 May 2013 17:02, Chris Radek<ch...@timeguy.com>  wrote:
>
>    
>> I thought it was a pin already.  I had always thought (in my "it
>> shouldn't be too hard..." way) that keying off that would be a way
>> to make an external component that slaves two motors and fakes all
>> the home signals etc.  It'd be pretty horrible but possible.
>>      
> I suggested it earlier as a way to check that two slaved axes were
> acceptably in-synch.
> One unpleasant scenario in the machine described is the failure of one
> home-switch, but not the other. I suggested a component that would
> panic if one axis was still searching more than a few mS after the
> other had started latching,
>
>    
>> To maintain this separately, it'd be great if you want to make a new
>> branch off v2.5_branch with this change.  Buildbot will even build
>> and package it for you (seb pointed me to "Sorting of..." on
>> http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/dev.html when I asked about this)
>>      
> The advantage of this would be that it is a less-experimental branch
> than master, and so probably OK for Jon to use on a customer machine?
>    
>> I still hope to work on joint slaving at fest next month - I have
>> the test hardware built and with jepler's help (a loaner 7i30 and
>> 5i20) I should have the hardware to run it.
>>      
> I was planning on also bringing my Mesa harware collection. Which is
> fairly extensive.
>
>    
>> I think that is the
>> real and permanent answer.  It's easy to hook two steppers together
>> but to get index homing we really need to sort out how it should
>> work and add it to motion's homing state machine.  I don't think you
>> can easily patch it up outside of motion.
>>      
> I understand that gentrivkins and ja3 works acceptably, but I have no
> idea if this also includes index-homing. It seems to me that it can
> only really work if the two indexes are set up in the right place.
> (or, I suppose, if the encoder components grew a fixed-offset pin)
>
>    

I think index homing on a gantry would only be worthwhile if home 
offsets could be applied after the index/marker pulse was found.
On a big servo system, you aren't going to want to rotate the motors to 
get the index/marker pulses aligned so the gantry is square.  It just 
isn't practical.

Dave Cole

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to