andy pugh wrote: > On 14 June 2013 15:03, Matt Shaver <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should, for >> example, the HAL be installable as a stand alone system (without the >> CNC part of linuxcnc)? That was John Kasunich's original idea. IIRC >> he was going to call it 'BLOCS'. I'm sorry that, at the time, I didn't >> push him in that direction. >> > > To a large extent it is. I do nearly all my testing in what amounts to > a HAL-only environment. I have even set up machine controls in that > way. (ie, halrun + stepgen + PyVCP + custom components) > And, I agree that we should keep this option to run hal standalone.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
