On Jul 10 2013 4:50 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 10 July 2013 11:34, EBo <e...@sandien.com> wrote: > >> I had been wondering about dragging the point back through the part >> -- >> causing extra/excessive ware on the tip). I wonder if you do, or >> could >> have, backed the tool out a little from contact, on the reverse. > > This was a one-off job, and in theory the tool dragging back up the > same slot shouldn't be too critical in that case. > In practice I wasn't sure that the tool was actually dragging back in > the _same_ slot even. So I did back out the cutter on the retract > (handily, the reverse action means that just gripping the adjuster > ring backs out the cutter) on the last cut.
yep. I wonder how we could measure the true position of the tip on the cut and reverse. I have no idea (because to really answer the question you would have to deal with tool flexture, etc... I do not follow the comment on "handily, the reverse action means that just gripping the adjuster ring backs out the cutter..." definitely thanks for sharing though ;-) EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
