Robert Ellenberg wrote: > This is 0.5 in / sec velocity cap, and 5 in / sec^2 acceleration cap for > all axes. It's a nice conservative setting since the steppers get fussy at > higher speeds. > WOW, that is quite amazing, then! I have to limit my Bridgeport to 3 in/sec^2 due to way undersized timing belts on it. But, 5 is QUITE low, and your demo really FLIES! I think we need to get this branch at least into the development master, because there are some people who could really take advantage of it. I rarely run into these problems, but I have seen a few projects where the lookahead really slowed things down, even on my slow machine. One was engraving letters on panels from Bobcad/CAM, all tiny vector segments.
I'll have to try it on my machine! Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
