> On 3 February 2016 at 08:29, TJoseph Powderly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > but we ( linuxcnc ) do not offload simple realtime tasks to reliable
> > non-jitter microcontrollers.
> 
> Because the whole point of the original EMC project was to perform all
> control (including realtime) on commodity computing hardware.
> There are other controllers that run on micros (Kflop, GRBL).
> 
> Some posts back someone said "LinuxCNC will never make it in the
> commercial world if...".
> 
> You know what? I don't care if it doesn't.

I guess most ot the code is written in C or C++ and then it should be no 
problem to compile them for micro controller. If real time tasks are 
implemented as functions called regularly porting should be simple. I guess 
there are some hardware abstraction since g-code interpreter, emcmot, pid work 
with different hardware and here some work would be required on micro 
controller.

We do not have to care about commercial world because nobody pay for it anyway.


Nicklas Karlsson

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to