2016-06-10 12:50 GMT+03:00 andy pugh <[email protected]>:

> My question was how you prevent the TP from doing it.
>
> The forum post seems to say that motion.tooloffset.z only changes when
> G43 is invoked,


That's what I observed..


> and at that point something (maybe not TP, maybe some
> other layer) applies an offset in cartesian Z.
>

I haven't observed any additional cartesian offset.
I've not yet investigated it thoroughly, but soon I'm going to perform some
5-axis machining and see how it all works out.


> So, one question is how to do a tool-change without applying the
> offset twice. (perhaps a remap is the way)
>
> Does your system handle the G41 / G42 cutter diameter compensation?


Yes, I use CAM compensation.
And that is an interesting question: how G41/G42 compensation works for
5axis? I've not tried that.


> I guess you could argue for doing that in the CAM system, but then the
> reason for going to the trouble of setting up a tool-centre based
> system is to be able to use 5-axis machining without being reliant on
> the CAM system having an accurate machine model.
>

I use CAM without a machine model.
Moreover, if I had machine model in CAM, tool offset compensation would not
be nesessary, CAM would do those calculations.
That is, in my case the machine does RTCP transformation
<https://infosys.beckhoff.com/content/1033/tccncprogramming/Images/image40_242.png>,
but CAM does tool diameter compensation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to