Moshe, Don't mean to be a real nit pick, but I've been corrected many times when asking this type of question. You're comparing apples with oranges. European directives are not standards.
Check to see which safety standard(s) was used for that product to declare compliance with 89/392/EEC, then the crossover *should be* straight forward. UL-3101 is laboratory equip if I'm not mistaken. If this product is made with the express purpose of inspecting PCB's in a mfr-ing environment, then I'm not sure using 3101 would be valid. I could be wrong about that. Regards, Doug At 06:43 PM 11/18/98 PST, [email protected] wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I have a product which was CE marked for safety according to the machinery directive. What >would the UL equivalent be? > >The product is a semi manual inspection station, used by an operator at a PCB (bare board) >manufacturer plant. The PC panel is placed on an automatically moving stage (accessible to >the opeator) and the operator is presented with failure locations. > >Would the UL3101 be applicable? --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
