be careful Jim, In Europe one harmonic standard has no power to exclude the requirements of another harmonic standard that is applicable to the apparatus. Especially those of EN 61000-3-2 and 61000-3-3 !! The target of the EMC-directive is covering all essential EMC requirements:
-Low frequency -High frequency -Radiated -Conducted for -Emission -Immunity and the permutations of the above. This does not mean that testing is required; you just sign for compliance. Any proof of compliance, even reasoning may be sufficient. In some cases you will need the opinion of a third party (CB). As some harmonized standards (55011) are older than these requirements, some incompatible statements may occur. These will be ruled out slowly when newer versions of the standard appear. Normally every standard will be updated once every 4 years. Be especially careful with all exceptions and notes in standards that for some (not) obvious reason try to exclude certain categories of equipment from some difficult to meet requirements IF a such-and-so-note is printed on the equipment. These have no value in Europe for ce marking. Basically most Class A (EN 55022 and 55011) are not easy to be sold in Europe due to the very strict definition of heavy industrial environment. In fact, if there is no very stringent (functional) reason why an equipment cannot meet Class B emissions, it should. No clauses allowed !!!! Regards, Gert Gremmen, (Ing) ce-test, qualified testing =============================================== Web presence http://www.cetest.nl CE-shop http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm /-/ Compliance testing is our core business /-/ =============================================== >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf >>Of Jim Conrad >>Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 3:17 PM >>To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>Subject: RE: EN 61000-3-3 Flicker Tests >> >> >> >>Hi Bruce, >> >>Your customer is correct. If the device is classified as a Class A >>(according to CISPR 11), you do not need to comply with flicker >>requirements. >> >>Jim >> >> >>Jim Conrad >>P.O. Box 25 >>Hamilton, MA 01936-0025 >>USA >> >>[email protected] >>Phone #: 978-468-3909 >>FAX #: 978-468-3909 >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>Behalf Of >>[email protected] >>Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 6:04 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: EN 61000-3-3 Flicker Tests >> >> >>Hello group! >> >>I've got a customer in our EMC lab that makes a laboratory instrument >>incorporating heaters with a typical 3-4 amp input current at 230vac. He >>is failing the flicker test due to the design of the heater control. They >>are undertaking a redesign but would like to keep selling product in the >>interim. >> >>They have come up with an interesting interpretation of the scope of EN >>61000-3-3: the standard specifies that the tests are applicable to >>products connected to the "public low voltage distribution >>systems" but if >>you take a typical industrial location or even a typical commercial >>location, isn't it true that these locations are fed by a dedicated >>transformer at the building that isolates them from the public network? I >>guess the question becomes - what is considered the public network? What >>if the marketing of the product was restricted to "industrial" locations? >> >>My initial reaction to the question was that anyplace you can plug or wire >>into at typical 230vac is considered the "public network", especially >>considering the mixed residential / commercial buildings common in Europe. >> >>Anyone care to comment? >> >>Bruce Fagley >>Sr. Specialist, EMC >>Industrial Products >>TUV Rheinland >>12 Commerce Rd. >>Newtown CT. 06470 >>203-426-0888 ext 119 >>203-426-4009 fax >> >> >>------------------------------------------- >>This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety >>Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. >> >>To cancel your subscription, send mail to: >> [email protected] >>with the single line: >> unsubscribe emc-pstc >> >>For help, send mail to the list administrators: >> Jim Bacher: [email protected] >> Michael Garretson: [email protected] >> >>For policy questions, send mail to: >> Richard Nute: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------- >>This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety >>Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. >> >>To cancel your subscription, send mail to: >> [email protected] >>with the single line: >> unsubscribe emc-pstc >> >>For help, send mail to the list administrators: >> Jim Bacher: [email protected] >> Michael Garretson: [email protected] >> >>For policy questions, send mail to: >> Richard Nute: [email protected] >> >>
<<attachment: Gert Gremmen.vcf>>
