Chris,

The way I understood it a couple years ago import and exploitation of
foreign equipment in Russia is determined by the Russian Government Order
612. The Order (Law) of goods imported into Russia went into effect July 1,
1993. The requirements of this Order are associated with
safety/quality/certification. 

Without the proper Russian certification you can experience long delays at
the borders (could be 30 days or more). I was working with the State
Research Center of the Russian Federation "D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for
Metrology" (VNIM) in St. Petersburg. The required certification will be
listed into their State Register and the certification will come from the
Gosstandard of Russia for ease of entry. 

In my opinion, what they are telling you is correct per Order 612 but copies
of your test report should reduce overall cost, as I remember their quote to
me was very similar to yours.  I decided not pursue this approach and take
my chances since many parts of Russia are happy with a Declaration of
Conformity indicating the international standards tested to. I guess it
depends on the amount of business you plan on doing in Russia and which
locale you are entering your product. 

Regards,

Mark

"Opinions expressed are mine and mine alone."


-----Original Message-----
From: Maxwell, Chris [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 3:54 PM
To: 'EMC-PSTC Internet Forum'
Subject: Russian Certification of Products



Our sales people in Russia have started the process of "Certifying" our
equipment to sell in Russia.  The two agencies that they are working with
are "Gosstandart" and the "Ministry of Communication".  

According to them, the certification will consist of an inspection of all of
our existing Compliance Documentation including ISO-9000 certification, EMC
Test Data (for the products of interest), Safety Test Data (for the products
of interest), Environmental Test Data including heat, frost, moisture,
vibration, and blow (what is that?) along with other inspections of our
calibration equipment and methods.  We are also being asked to pay for a
trip to the US for 3 people from the Ministry of Communication and
Gosstandart (6 people total) for 7 days each.  

The total is a staggering $44,000 (either cash or wire transfer).   Note
that all of the actions being performed for this are "inspections" of
existing documentation, not actual testing.   So in the end, they will
decide to certify our products based upon existing documentation, testing...
I have never experienced this before.  It appears to be a great deal of
expense for not much substance.  Is this typical?  Has anybody else out
there certified products with these agencies?  

By the way, we typically classify our product as "light industrial test and
measurement equipment" and already have solid testing and documentation to
to EN 61326-1 (EMC), EN 61010-1 (Safety) and EN 60825-1 (Laser Safety).
Does this give us any kind of out?

Chris Maxwell, Design Engineer
GN Nettest Optical Division
109 N. Genesee St.  
Utica, NY 13502
PH:  315-797-4449
FAX:  315-797-8024
EMAIL:  [email protected]



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to