I agree that the 4-3 is a basic standard.  EN 301489-1 is an immunity
standard for radios and specifies the 2 GHz upper limit.  As the foundation
is established in the basic standard and there is a proliferation of
personal communications devices, it would not surprise me to see other
standards amended.  For now, the product family standard due in 2003 is EN
301489-1.

Don Umbdenstock
Sensormatic Electronics Corporation

> ----------
> From:         Pettit, Ghery[SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent:         Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:17 PM
> To:   '[email protected]'; [email protected]
> Cc:   [email protected]
> Subject:      RE: Power Amplifier for 2 GHz Immunity
> 
> The question that would then arise is this - what standard using EN
> 61000-4-3 calls out immunity testing above 1 GHz?  EN 55024:1998 for ITE
> does not, nor does CISPR 24 upon which it is based.  Unless a standard
> using
> EN 61000-4-3 as a test method requires immunity testing above 1 GHz, the
> added procedure has no meaning for a particular product.
> 
> Ghery Pettit
> Intel
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:41 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Power Amplifier for 2 GHz Immunity
> 
> 
> 
> Bob,
> 
> EN 301489-1 due in 2003 calls for radiated immunity testing to 2 GHz.
> EN61000-4-3 also indicates testing to 2 GHz due to the portable phone
> market.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Don Umbdenstock
> Sensormatic Electronics Corporation
> 
> > ----------
> > From:       [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Sent:       Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:15 AM
> > To:         [email protected]
> > Cc:         [email protected]
> > Subject:    Re: Power Amplifier for 2 GHz Immunity
> > 
> > 
> > We have recently purchased an Amplifier Research Model 25SIG4A and we
> use
> > an
> > AR FP2080 probe. We have two antennas for that range, a Schaffner bilog
> > and
> > an
> > A. H. Systems horn.
> > 
> > Other than the upcoming 60601-1-2 for medical equipment, are there any
> > other upcoming
> > standards that call out immunity testing over a gig? To my knowledge no
> > present standard
> > does.
> > 
> > Bob Heller
> > 3M Product Safety, 76-1-01
> > St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
> > Tel:  651- 778-6336
> > Fax:  651-778-6252
> > 
> >
> ==========================================================================
> > ====
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >                     UMBDENSTOCK@Senso
> > 
> >                     rmatic.com             To:
> > [email protected]                                       
> >                                            cc:     (bcc: Robert E.
> > Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)                        
> >                     09/05/2001 10:19       Subject:     Power Amplifier
> > for 2 GHz Immunity                           
> >                     AM
> > 
> >                     Please respond to
> > 
> >                     UMBDENSTOCK
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hello Forum,
> > 
> > I was wondering what amplifier you are using for the 2 GHz testing
> > requirement of EN61000-4-3?  Any comments regarding "if I had to do it
> > over
> > again, I would have . . . " relative to your 2 GHz setup?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Don Umbdenstock
> > 
> > Sensormatic
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> > 
> > Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> > 
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> >      [email protected]
> > with the single line:
> >      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> > 
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> >      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
> >      Dave Heald                [email protected]
> > 
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> >      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
> >      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> > 
> > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> >     No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
> > messages are imported into the new server.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
>      Dave Heald                [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
> messages are imported into the new server.
> 

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to