I read in !emc-pstc that Doug Massey <[email protected]> wrote (in <006c01c3dfaa$b5a41690$1d01000a@Doug>) about 'Safety standard for LCD/PDP TVs' on Tue, 20 Jan 2004: > Back to Raymond?s original post, I would think that the TV without > ?PC mode? CANNOT be evaluated to 60950, as it would fall clearly > under the scope of EN 60065, and not under 60950. For the unit with > ?PC mode?, I assume that it could be defined as a multimedia device > per IEC Guide 112, and could therefore be evaluated to the 60950 > standard, if so desired. > The situation is that the OSM decision and Guide 112 disagree. The Guide doesn't go into details, and the devil is in the details. ANY TV, with or without a PC mode, is a 'multimedia' product, because it falls within the definition adopted by IEC TC100. So is a sound radio, which is really a 'monomedium' product.
We really need a revised Guide 112 that takes account of the snags that have been discovered in trying to apply 60950 to '60065' products (and vice versa, if anyone ever did that). But if no National Committee makes such a proposal, it won't happen. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
