[email protected] wrote (in
<of4dfcba4f.8b0f8edb-on86257051.002a7817-86257051.002af...@mmm.com>)
about 'Request for info on CE Mark penalties', on Tue, 2 Aug 2005:
>Dave, I have been trying for some time now to find out just exactly how
>limits lines were derived. Can you point me to a study/report/data that
>can show me (or more importantly, others here at work) just how the
>limits were derived? No one seems to be able to.
Derived from a mixture of experience, experiments and theoretical
studies. I meant what I said about setting the limits so as to reduce
interference complaints to an acceptable minimum. If the number of
complaints starts to increase, steps are taken to tighten the limits.
There is less motivation to relax limits if complaints fall to very low
levels, as may happen in Europe now that immunity is controlled.
You may find this helpful:
CISPR/TR 16-4-4 {Ed.1.0} Specification for radio disturbance and
immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 4-4: Uncertainties,
statistics and limit modelling - Statistics of complaints and a model
for the calculation of limits.
Note 'a model for the calculation of limits'.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
Deadlines are 90% of deadliness.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
