Jan,

a few thoughts: 

> -3- after considering all standards -  CISPR11, CISPR22, IEC 61800-3,
EN 50370-1 - I would 
> say that CISPR22 best fits this specific equipment. 

A printer is IT equipment, we may enter a gray zone here, but I agree
with you.

> -4- however, there is - to my opinion - something missing in CISPR22
because 
> it does not consider  industrial environments. That is, it does not
differentiate between 
> connected to the public low voltage (or domestic) and to  non-public
low voltage 
> supply systems (or industrial). This drives industry to using CISPR11
or IEC 61800-3 
> standards, where the conducted emissions limits are higher. I think
these higher 
> limits are technically justified in certain type of equipment. 

CISPR 22 does not explicitly specify industrial environment, but makes a
differences between
Class A and Class B equipment. 
I would not expect that such a large printer will be installed in a room
which could be 
called an office, so I think Class A would be the better fit.
I also see the problem public low voltage vs. non-public low voltage,
CISPR 22 does not make
a difference here

For immunity I would consider IEC 61000-6-2 as the final installation
could be an industrial 
environment.

Best regards,

Michael Nagel

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to