In message <002801c72f9a$b6e02380$3300a8c0@Raymond>, dated Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Scott Xe <[email protected]> writes >Thanks for your further clarification. > >It seems every product already complies with the old and new directives >and the new directive has not been transposed into local law and thus >it is not legally required to appear on the DoC yet. > >It is wise and practical approach to create any new DoC to use the new >directive. It is no hurry to the new DoCs and saves lots of re-do work >for past and current DoCs. > >Are there any points to add?
I don't think so. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Politically unexceptionable seasonal greetings to all. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
