To All,
Thank you very much for your comments and support. I agree with Brian O'Connell not to bind the document data to any specific software application. I must apologize that I have no idea about the ODF format. CSV format is easy for everyone to access. However, I am not sure if it would be clear to read. I believe either html or PDF format would be a good approach. I would discuss this offline with other volunteer(s) and our administrator(s). It is always not good to be a one-person operation. I think we had better to have two volunteers to start with and update the file. I am happy that Richard Georgerian offers to help. I agree with Neil Barker that we should certainly address other standards than Wi-Fi, such as Zigbee, Bluetooth, and so on. We understand this involves high tech knowledge and takes time. With many experts in the group, I believe we can achieve it some day. Richard, let's start. We have to include Scott Douglas in our e-mail communication and let him instruct us a good way for members. If anyone in the group would like to comment or to be included in the discussion during preparation stage, please let us know. If you have information relating to this task and would like to share with members, please forward to Richard and me. Richard, if it is OK for you, let's have a very draft copy back to members in 2-3 weeks. Anyone is welcome to send us comments anytime. Best regards, Grace On 4/3/07, Barker, Neil <[email protected]> wrote: All, Of course, I am biased, having supplied the file that Scott refers to below. I wish I could volunteer to update this, but I simply do not have the time. I suggest that only one or two people should be 'editors' of the master file, which they can keep off-line and share between them (if more than one), posting a pdf version to the download area for review as with my original. The original of my pdf file is in Word 2000, and whoever is appointed (volunteers) as editor is more than welcome to a copy of the Word file, which could then be easily transferred to another format (.xls is probably more useful). The pdf version will always be readable by everybody since Acrobat Reader is available for free download from www.adobe.com <http://www.adobe.com/> . Grace, if you are volunteering to take this on, confirm that to me by direct e-mail and I'll send you the Word file. Responding to other messages on this topic, we should certainly address other standards than Wi-Fi, such as Zigbee, Bluetooth, and so on. One interesting comment received recently that supports the misinformation that has been mentioned before comes from an EU Notified Body who commented that it is estimated that about 83% of Wi-Fi ( 802.11x) products on the market that claim to be compliant with EU standards are not so. There is an opportunity here to produce an independent and accurate picture based on the true sources of information. Best regards Neil R. Barker CEng MIET FSEE MIEEE Manager Quality Engineering e2v technologies (uk) ltd 106 Waterhouse Lane Chelmsford Essex CM1 2QU UK Tel: (+44) 1245 453616 Fax: (+44) 1245 453571 Mob: (+44) 7801 723735 P Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Scott Douglas [mailto: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]] Sent: 03 April 2007 02:54 To: Grace Lin Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Wordwide Frequencies and Power Levels for 802.11 Grace, There is already a file on the EMC-PSTC Forum web site, in the Files section, 802 frequency exemptions.pdf (64 KB). This may be useful in preparing the spreadsheet you are volunteering for. The most common file types would be .xls, .csv, .txt, .pdf, and I suppose .htm. I've never heard of .odf, but I suppose if someone can translate to/from it... Keep in mind what looks good in one format may not look at all good in another without serious reformatting. Also, what is anyone going to do with this file, will they need to just view, or search, or manipulate? That will help guide the file format. I would make the following suggestions: 1) Make the file name include some sort of version control (I use the date - 20070402 for April 2, 2007) and use underscore to replace spaces in the name; 2) If you want/need to post multiple file formats of the data, please put them in a zip file named as in the step above. This way there is only one file to store and retrieve. The file (or zip file) can be posted in the Files section of the EMC-PSTC Forum web site. While any member can post files there, I would suggest keeping this limited to one or two people. That way I won't have to do a house cleaning operation and remove the eleventy-seven variants of the thing. So I would suggest anyone can download a copy, make their changes and send to the duly delegated receiver for updating the master copy. Grace, is that you? Best Regards, Scott Douglas EMC-PSTC Administrator email: [email protected] Grace Lin wrote: Dear Members, I am sorry it takes so long to get back to you. I would be more than happy to be the volunteer. To start with, I need members' assistance and support to determine the scope. The subject is "Worldwide Frequencies and Power Levels for 802.11". My questions are: 1. Should we focus on frequencies and power levels only? If yes, should we focus on the 2.4GHz band only? Or, should we include the 5.8GHz band? 2. Should we focus on the wideband data systems only (spread spectrum devices such as regulated under FCC 15.247)? 3. Should we focus on 802.11 only? Or, should we include any other technique using the same frequencies interested, such as 802.15.4 (zigbee)? 4. Which countries should be started with, US, EU, China, Japan, etc.? I feel confident to start with US, EU, and China. For all other countries, I will have to depend on members' input. 5. The title row of the Excel spreadsheet suggested by Peter works fine for me. I will need Peter's help to understand the "ISO country code" and how to find a code for each country. I suggest we add a column for information/document sources (such as government/document URL links if available). This would prevent incorrect information as Neil Barker mentioned. 6. We will have to determine a way to distribute to the members for review, correction, and post. George Stults mentioned one way to do it. Please feel free to have your comments on. Best regards, Grace Lin Sent by E2V TECHNOLOGIES PLC or a member of the E2V group of companies. A company registered in England and Wales. Company number: 04439718. Registered address: 106 Waterhouse Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 2QU, UK. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
