Surprised no one before now has suggested a Variac -- and an AC DVM, many of which do meet the accuracy requirement mentioned. Or is this another test so critical humans aren't allowed to perform it?
Cortland Richmond Measure with a micrometer, Mark with chalk Cut with a chainsaw (opinion NOT my employer's) -----Original Message----- >From: Ron Pickard <[email protected]> >Sent: Oct 6, 2011 12:33 PM >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: [PSES] hi-pot tester > >Hi Brian, > >Instead of looking for such a high precision hipot tester, I'm wondering if >instead you've considered a high precision calibrated load (only used for >verification) where the pass/fail points would be known with a high degree of >accuracy. Please note that I had experience with this in a past life that >proved to be acceptable with the agencies with daily or before each shift >verification. > >Just two cents to throw into this pot. IHTH. > >I look forward to your reply. > >Best regards, > >Ron > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
