Glad to here it. Perhaps technical committee TC108 should consider pulling in IEC 61010-1 into that new standard too.
There are other examples were a merge of two or more standards makes sense, like integrating UL1741, UL1012, UL1776, UL1236, UL1564 and UL458. ______________________________________ ______________________________________________ Ralph McDiarmid | Schneider Electric | Renewable Energies Business | CANADA | Regulatory Engineer From: Richard Nute <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] List-Post: [email protected] Date: 09/15/2010 05:00 PM Subject: Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] IEC 60950-1 vs IEC 60601-1 ________________________________ > I'd like to see a generalized approach to product safety with one or two > generic standards and not the large proliferation of standards which we > have today. IEC 62368-1 is a step in this direction. Yes, safeguards against electric shock are the same for a computer as for a toaster. For medical, the limits are tighter. ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for SPAM content and Viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. ________________________________________________________________________ - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]>
