In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, "James, Chris" <[email protected]> writes:
> >If the interpretation of Annex I (3) (below) is the same as RoHS where >consumer covered B2B professional products also then we have another >party to go to............... L There is a similar interpretation issue with the last phrase of Article 2 subsection 1. However, a UK trade association has received from the British Ministry concerned an indication that 'professional' products not intended for use in the home are NOT within the scope. However, the Regulation lumps 'office' with 'household', so there is another way in which the wording is ambiguous and, if we believe the Ministry, misleading. You may notice that 'hi-fi recorders' are listed. Immediately begin to manufacture 'lo-fi recorders'! -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
