The distinction was made, IMHO, as consumer products are more likely to be produced in large numbers, so The impact of the regulation will be larger.
I believe *your* focus should be directed towards: "can my design be used in such amounts that a considerable amount of otherwise spoiled energy can be saved, and can a small effort on our companies side contribute to the energy wealth of future generations" and then decide if you will voluntarily meet she specs of this directive, even if you are not targeted directly. And as John says: >consider whether a 'stand-by' mode is really necessary. Also, >provide a switch that really DOES turn everything off, including the >charger for the battery-backed up clock. (;-) And if you are convinced that any energy problem will soon be resolved by engineering (which is not unlikely), think of our current dependency of oil for producing electricity, and the costs associated with defending our interests in the middle east. I want to emphasize -dear moderators- that this is not an invitation to go Politics on this list, but can be shown to be a mere fact. Gert Gremmen Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Kunde, Brian Verzonden: dinsdag 13 januari 2009 18:31 Aan: John Woodgate; [email protected] Onderwerp: RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power This reminds of a situation that occurred many years ago where the US Air Force had a contract with a computer company to supply then with hundred of thousands of PCs. Because they were to be used by the military, they only had to meet the FCC Class A emissions requirements. The problem was that as old computers were replaced by newer faster computers, many of these old computers ended up in people's homes. As interference complaints stated coming into the FCC, a change in the status quo occurred and from that time on all PCs or any product that could be used in a residential environment had to be Class B even though it was not the intended initial use or market. So whenever I see these kind of ambiguity regarding household and professional equipment, I wonder if the intent is to insure that a product likely to be used in a household meets all the desired requirements. It wasn't that many years ago it was assumed that any device with a network interface would never be used in a home. But today, many homes have networks. So, it would be difficult to identify something as "professional" when the definition of the type of devices used in a home is constantly changing. IMHO, The Other Brian From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power In message <of08f7b138.78ed5165-on8625753d.00566e0d-8625753d.0056c...@amat.com>, dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, [email protected] writes: >This seems to create some ambiguity with regard to the question of >"does this regulation apply to consumer-type equipment that happens to >be integrated as a component of industrial equipment?" It does mean that, and I don't think it's ambiguous in the case of consumer products 'adopted' for professional use. 'Professional' products NOT marketed for household use are not included, but the coupling of 'office' with 'household' in the text does create further uncertainty. First consider whether a 'stand-by' mode is really necessary. Also, provide a switch that really DOES turn everything off, including the charger for the battery-backed up clock. (;-) -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]> LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]> - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
