This reminds of a situation that occurred many years ago where the US
Air Force had a contract with a computer company to supply then with
hundred of thousands of PCs. Because they were to be used by the
military, they only had to meet the FCC Class A emissions requirements.
The problem was that as old computers were replaced by newer faster
computers, many of these old computers ended up in people's homes. As
interference complaints stated coming into the FCC, a change in the
status quo occurred and from that time on all PCs or any product that
could be used in a residential environment had to be Class B even though
it was not the intended initial use or market. 

So whenever I see these kind of ambiguity regarding household and
professional equipment, I wonder if the intent is to insure that a
product likely to be used in a household meets all the desired
requirements. 

It wasn't that many years ago it was assumed that any device with a
network interface would never be used in a home.  But today, many homes
have networks. So, it would be difficult to identify something as
"professional" when the definition of the type of devices used in a home
is constantly changing. 

IMHO,
The Other Brian




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

In message 
<of08f7b138.78ed5165-on8625753d.00566e0d-8625753d.0056c...@amat.com>, 
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, [email protected] writes:

>This seems to create some ambiguity with regard to the question of 
>"does this regulation apply to consumer-type equipment that happens to 
>be integrated as a component of industrial equipment?"

It does mean that, and I don't think it's ambiguous in the case of 
consumer products 'adopted' for professional use. 'Professional' 
products NOT marketed for household use are not included, but the 
coupling of 'office' with 'household' in the text does create further 
uncertainty.

First consider whether a 'stand-by' mode is really necessary. Also, 
provide a switch that really DOES turn everything off, including the 
charger for the battery-backed up clock. (;-)
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

LECO Corporation Notice:  This communication may contain confidential 
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by 
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error.  Thank  you.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>


Reply via email to