Yes,

Calibration doesn’t mean adjustment.

All the parameters must fulfill the requirement in the applied calibration
standard

And use “insertion loss” or “Voltage division factor” or “transfer
impedance” (different terminologies but they are simply correction factors)
in your tests,

 

OOO (Own opinions only)

Best regards,

Deniz Demirci
National Technical Systems (NTS Canada)
Phone: 403-568-6605 ext 244
fax: 403-568-6970
email:[email protected]
web: http://www.ntscorp.com/about/locations
<http://www.ntscorp.com/about/locations> 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Javor
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse
modulation

 

The LISN or CDN has to be within some tolerance of the ideal requirement in
the governing standard, right?  That’s it.
 
 
Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261



________________________________

From: <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:14:56 -0700
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse
modulation


But how do you calibrate a LISN or an CDN?   If there is no adjustment, then
the best one can do is to 'characterize' or provide an accurate 'scale
factor'. 

What would auditors look for other than test data compared against published
numbers for the transducer?
_______________________________________
_____________________________________________ 

Ralph McDiarmid  |  Schneider Electric  |  Renewable Energies Business  |  
CANADA  |   Regulatory Engineer 


From: Deniz Demirci <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 08/12/2010 12:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse
modulation 

________________________________




I've been performing in-house calibrations of LNA's, LISN's, CDN's, Current
clamps and they have been accepted by the auditors. There is no restriction in
terms of 17025 if you follow the requirements such as dedicated calibration
instrumentation and MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY assessment.
I admit my MU figure for calibration is larger than a calibration laboratory
and it is accounted in EMC measurements.
Again, how do you guarantee / justify what you are doing if you don't care
about the MU.

I am strongly disagree with the “I did it and it is correct” attitude in
EMC discipline. Maybe it explains the overall situation and measurement
deviations between the laboratories

OOO (Own opinions only)

Best regards,

Deniz Demirci
National Technical Systems (NTS Canada)
Phone: 403-568-6605 ext 244
fax: 403-568-6970
email:[email protected]
web: http://www.ntscorp.com/about/locations
<http://www.ntscorp.com/about/locations>
<http://www.ntscorp.com/about/locations>  



From: [email protected] on behalf of Bob Richards
Sent: Thu 8/12/2010 7:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse modulation


--- On Thu, 8/12/10, Ken Javor <[email protected]> wrote:


And similarly, not because of MU but because of 17025 or perhaps ISO 9000,
I've seen test equipment that could easily have been calibrated in house, such
as current probes, LISNs and a 41 inch rod antenna have to be sent to the
calibration lab.  This is totally unproductive, except for the calibration
lab.  And I would argue further that it is detrimental to the discipline,
because if you do your own calibration, you understand better how things work.

 
This is a subject near to my heart. I've performed in-house calibrations of
cables, LISNs, CDNs, current probes etc, and I agree 100% with what you said.
Knowing the procedure helps to understand how things work and, just as
important, gives a person the knowledge of how to perform quick verifications
of a test setup in case there is ever any question as to the proper operation
of that equipment.
 
Every so often, a conversation comes up in the lab about whether we should do
in-house calibrations. The issue is never about MU, cost or validity of data,
it usually hinges around 17025 and what auditors will say.
 
IMHO, shipping LISNs and/or CDNs to have calibrations performed by a cal lab
is less reliable than in-house calibrations. This has little to do with the
cal lab's ability, but from the possibility of damage during shipping. I've
had CDNs come back with stuff rattling around inside (possibly chips off of
ferrites?). If I can't perform an impedance verification in house, then what
should I do to insure it is not damaged - send it back to the cal lab?
 
Bob R.
 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc>
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc>  
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/>  
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html>
<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html>  
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>  

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>


________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for SPAM content and Viruses by the MessageLabs
Email Security System.
________________________________________________________________________ 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>  >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc>
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc>  
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/>  
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html>
<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html>  
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>  

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>  >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>  > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>  >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>  > 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to