Or 'calibration' of current transformers.  Surly these can only be 'scaled', if 
I understand the distinction in terminology correctly.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
 

Ralph McDiarmid  |   Schneider Electric   |  Renewable Energies Business  |   
CANADA  |   Regulatory Engineer 



From:   Ken Javor <[email protected]> 
To:     [email protected] 
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:   08/12/2010 06:32 AM 
Subject:        Re: [PSES] Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse 
modulation

________________________________




And similarly, not because of MU but because of 17025 or perhaps ISO 9000, I’ve 
seen test equipment that could easily have been calibrated in house, such as 
current probes, LISNs and a 41 inch rod antenna have to be sent to the 
calibration lab.  This is totally unproductive, except for the calibration lab. 
 And I would argue further that it is detrimental to the discipline, because if 
you do your own calibration, you understand better how things work.

Oh, and my favorite, the calibration of microwave horn antennas, whose 
properties are entirely set by their linear dimensions. The measurement or 
verification that their dimensions have not changed since their original 
acquisition is so much more accurate than the direct measurement of their gain. 
 In fact any passive antenna used in the EMI measurement business can be easily 
checked visually for dimensional abnormalities, and those with a balun, such as 
a dipole, biconical or logperiodic can be checked for vswr using a directional 
coupler; no need for expensive and time consuming annual or semi-annual trips 
to a calibration facility.  If it isn’t physically damaged, and the vswr meets 
original specs, meaning the balun is good, the antenna is good.

Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261



________________________________

From: Cortland Richmond <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:24:17 -0400
To: emc-pstc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse modulation

A tangential issue: those who rely on that algorithmic process often don't know 
why certain things are required and  others left unsaid.  I've see a manager 
forbid using a high-pass filter during CE testing because it appeared nowhere 
in a standard's setup drawings. Demonstration was required!


Cortland
KA5S


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ken Javor <mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>   
To: Untitled <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>  
Sent: 8/11/2010 1:04:51 PM 
Subject: Re: Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse modulation

Bingo.  Clearly another driver for inserting MU where it doesn't belong is a 
desire to replace the need for competent personnel with an algorithmic process 
that works for any personnel.  But the same personnel who don‚t know how to 
properly perform the test will also not know how to run the algorithm. Hence 
Mr. Walton‚s observations on how poorly MU is executed in reality.

Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261



________________________________

From: Dennis Ward <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:50:21 -0700
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse modulation

I think I would only add that while measurement uncertainties for EMC is 
nebulous at best, at the same time we do not want to get into the habit of a 
slam dunk mentality of Œoh, just a number, it doesn‚t matter.‰  

That is why Derek‚s statement of „What‚s really needed is a competent 
individual with adequate equipment‰ is so important.  Where electromagnetic 
compatibility is concerned, competence of the engineers doing the measurement 
is probably much more importa! nt than uncertainties. I know that one of the 
biggest benefits to testing in the radio approvals industry is competence of 
test personnel.

Compliance does matter and the best way to keep unneeded uncertainties out of 
the EMC measurement industry, is to keep competence of test personnel in.




Dennis Ward 
Director of Engineering
American TCB 
Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com 
<http://www.atcb.com/> <http://www.atcb.com/>  
703-847-4700 fax 703-847-6888 
direct - 703-880-4841 



-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc> 
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> 
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html> 
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>  

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for SPAM content and Viruses by the MessageLabs 
Email Security System.
________________________________________________________________________ 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc> 
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> 
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
<http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>  

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to