It is probably not a bad idea to have the engineer from the NRTL contact the
inspector. The engineer should have a rationale why the construction is
considered acceptable. The inspector may or may not listen to the NRTL
engineer, but a representative from a NRTL will generally carry more weight
than a representative from a manufacturer.

 

Scott Aldous

Compliance Engineer

Advanced Energy

Tel: 970-407-6872

Fax: 970-407-5872

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christine
Rodham
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:55 AM
To: [email protected]; Brian O'Connell
Subject: RE: NRTL Mark vs. NEC Inspector

 

 What is a "NEC (National Electrical Code) inspector" ? -   The local city
inspector that enforces the NEC.

 

I will have to get the formal information ( chapter and verse) from the
installer ( who is out-sourced by us ) I received a voice-mail this morning
regarding this incident.

 

Thanks

 

Christine


--- On Wed, 5/13/09, Brian O'Connell <[email protected]> wrote:

        
        From: Brian O'Connell <[email protected]>
        Subject: RE: NRTL Mark vs. NEC Inspector
        To: [email protected]
        Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 8:11 AM

        What is a "NEC (National Electrical Code) inspector" ?
        
        In any case, the electrical/fire inspector should have noted specific 
NFPA70
clauses. You cannot conform to code until you know the requirement.
        
        Fault conditions, as described for Type Tests in a product safety 
standard,
are not defined in the NEC. The NEC 'tends' to describe required construction
for various combinations of specific ratings and environments.
        
        The biggie is for > 150V to P.E., where all exposed metal must be 
'grounded'
for Class I construction. I do not like this, but there is an NEC clause that
allows an exemption for insulated heat sinks.
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected] <http://us.mc5
7.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>  [mailto:[email protected]
<http://us.mc557.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> ]On Behalf Of
Christine Rodham
        Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:38 AM
        To: [email protected] <http://us.mc557
mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> 
        Subject: Re:NRTL Mark vs. NEC Inspector
        
        List Members,
        
        We have an interesting problem. We sold an OEM product ( very high end 
Home
Theater Movie Projector , better than a movie theater quality) which was
listed by a well known NRTL. ( We modify and enhance the SW for high end
performance)
        
        The projector was installed in a public place and the installation was
evaluated by a NEC ( National Electrical Code ) inspector. 
        
        The projector has a metal ungrounded heat sink attached to the chassis 
that
was added for cooling but was evaluated and approved by the NRTL. 
        
        The NEC inspector will not sign off on the installation stating 
non-current
carrying exposed metal parts that may be accidentally energized must be
grounded to the chassis. Grounding the heat-sink to the chassis will be
difficult due to the design of this special aluminum heat-sink.
        
        Here are my questions:
        
        * What is the criteria to determine if a metal part can become 
accidentally
energized?
          The only way it could happen in this case is if the power cord that 
is near
the heat-sink is
          damaged and then touches the heat-sink. The power cord is UL approved 
and
properly 
          rated.
        
        * How many fault conditions ( single vs multiple ) are considered to
determine if a metal part can become accidentally energized.
        
        * What would be our best option in arguing this ruling. Should we 
request
another inspector or get the NRTL involved?
        
        Note that this unit is ceiling mounted and only trained service people 
would
have access to it after the initial installation.
        
        Thank you!
        
        Christine Rodham
        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <http://us.mc557.mai
.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL.
        
        Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected] <h
tp://us.mc557.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <htt
://us.mc557.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher:  <[email protected] <http:
/us.mc557.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        David Heald: <[email protected] <http:/
us.mc557.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

This message, including any attachments, may contain information that is
confidential and proprietary information of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
The dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message or any of its
attachments is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to