"...if all devices were tested separately the number of observed problems
during using them in sets will grow by zero, zero, nothing."
 
Alas,
The problems seem to grow by the cube of the permutations of geometric sum of
triple integral of number of connections. <;-)
 
The symptom that empty ports don't radiate much, nor do poorly terminated
cables that are not plugged into previously mentioned ports, seems to manifest
when those two parts are plugged together, thus the reason for "system"
testing.
 

- Bill
Indecision may or may not be the problem.

--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Piotr Galka <[email protected]> wrote:



        From: Piotr Galka <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: SV: "Quiet" Laptop
        To: "EMC-PSTC" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
        Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 9:21 AM
        
        
        From: <[email protected]
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>
>
        > 
        > If emission at (a) and (b) are same then DUT is not the cause, else 
DUT is
        > the cause. Can't  we conclude this way. Finding a quite laptop or hub 
seem
        > to be almost impossible.
        > 
        If that way of concluding would be OK than also testing DUT without 
laptop
would be OK (without don't means not connected with laptop).
        
        The idea behind testing together is that these devices will work 
together so
the whole set should be EMC, but in my opinion that idea is only the source of
a lot of problems.
        I believe if all devices were tested separately the number of observed
problems during using them in sets will grow by zero, zero, nothing.
        
        Piotr Galka 
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <http://us.mc01g.mai
.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL.
        
        Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected] <http
//us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <htt
://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher:  <[email protected] <http:
/us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        David Heald: <[email protected] <http:/
us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to