Rich,
You are correct they will accept a recognize marking system without test - but 
it doesn't matter, if they are preparing a CB report for Europe they are 
required to test the label.

Gary


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Nute [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] 60950-1 durability test solvent

Hi David:


Two issues are involved here:

1)  Label adherence to the surface to which it is attached;
2)  Durability of the data printed on the label.

I don't have a copy of UL 969, so I don't know if it
addresses both issues.

If you are dealing with UL, I'm sure you can get them to
accept UL 969 without the 60950-1 durability test.

However, if you are dealing strictly with 60950-1 (as
in a CB report), then the label must pass the durability
test.

In my experience, there is not much difference between
the required hexane and turpentine/paint thinner.  If
I recall correctly, turpentine/paint thinner is more
severe than hexane.

The test itself is not very repeatable, especially if
the result is marginal.


Best regards,
Rich





On 3/26/2013 12:31 PM, Gelfand, David wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I am not an organic chemist either.  With great effort I recall C and H with 
> funny subscript numbers...
>
> We are using a UL 969-approved label system.
> Surprise, it didn't pass the hexane durability test!
> Looking through UL 969, there doesn't seem to be an equivalent durability 
> test.
>
> It would appear that having a UL 969 approved label system does not guarantee 
> passing the durability test as specified in 60950-1.
> Or as I asked my safety lab guy, "Did someone spike your hexane?"
>
> Has anyone ever encountered this problem before?
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PSES] 60950-1 durability test solvent
>
> Next paragraph says
>
> "As an alternative, it is permitted to use a reagent grade hexane with a 
> minimum of 85 % as n-hexane.
> NOTE The designation "n-hexane" is chemical nomenclature for a ?normal? or 
> straight chain hydrocarbon. This petroleum spirit may further be identified 
> as a certified ACS (American Chemical Society) reagent grade hexane (CAS# 
> 110-54-3)."
>
> I am not an organic chemist. Perhaps acetone or methylcyclohexane would be 
> suitable alternate. Heptane is considered close, but do not know if easily 
> sourced.
>
> Also, as hexane is on the U.S. and Canada list of really bad carcinogenic 
> stuff, and TC108 needs to find something else that is a reasonably available 
> equivalent.
>
> Perhaps the best long-term solution would be use of UL969-approved label 
> system.
>
> Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Gelfand, David
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:32 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: 60950-1 durability test solvent
>
>
> Is there a product I can buy at the hardware store that is roughly equivalent 
> to the hexane specified in durability test:
>
> " The petroleum spirit to be used for the test is aliphatic solvent hexane 
> having a maximum aromatics content of 0,1 % by volume, a kauributenol value 
> of 29, an initial boiling point of approximately 65 °C, a dry point of 
> approximately 69 °C and a mass per unit volume of approximately 0,7 kg/l."
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> David
> Kontron Canada Inc.
>
>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to