Lauren, Since you mentioned Korea (Asia), I would like to share China CCC experience.
Due to a new version of harmonic standard, all existing CCC certificates with this standard must be updated before October 1, 2014. A Chinese lab engineer informed us that we didn't need a test sample as the product rated 50W (not greater than 75W). I believe the process for the lab is similar to "a simple update to the test report is all that is needed" as Ghery stated. Best regards, Grace Lin On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Crane, Lauren <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks for the helpful replies so far. I should clarify in this case the > regulatory context is Korea – ENs are essentially equivalent to KNs. **** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > Lauren Crane**** > > KLA-Tencor**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, August 30, 2013 3:18 PM > *To:* Crane, Lauren > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?**** > > ** ** > > Lauren --**** > > **** > > A similar thread is currently running on LinkedIn:**** > > > http://www.linkedin.com/groups/CISPR-22-24-compliance-update-2278131.S.269600494?view=&gid=2278131&type=member&item=269600494&trk=eml-anet_dig-b_nd-pst_ttle-cn > **** > > **** > > Here is my comment on that thread, but I look forward to the experienced > feedback from this EMC-PSTC group of experts:**** > > "This is a tough one. > 1. The essential requirements of ANNEX I of 2004/108/EC are stated with a > reference to state of the art: "Equipment shall be so designed and > manufactured, having regard to the state of the art, as to ensure that:..." > 2. Harmonized standards are regularly updated, presumably at least in part > to reflect the state of the art. > 3. If you are choosing to demonstrate conformance with the essential > requirements by demonstrating conformance with the applicable harmonized > standards, it seems to me that you have an obligation to periodically > review whether changes to the harmonized standards constitute changes to > the state of the art as applied to your products..." > > Mike **** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Lauren Crane" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Friday, August 30, 2013 3:05:28 PM > *Subject: *[PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?**** > > Dear Experts, **** > > **** > > A test lab is suggesting that because EN61000-6-4:2007 will be superseded > in 2014, all conforming products must be retested to the new standard, even > if no changes have occurred in the product. **** > > **** > > Is this a fair claim?**** > > **** > > Regards,**** > > Lauren Crane**** > > KLA-Tencor**** > > **** > > - > ----------------------------------------------------------------**** > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc > discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to < > [email protected]>**** > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html**** > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at > http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in > well-used formats), large files, etc.**** > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html **** > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas <[email protected]> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> **** > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher <[email protected]> > David Heald <[email protected]> **** > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc > discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to < > [email protected]> > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at > http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in > well-used formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas <[email protected]> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher <[email protected]> > David Heald <[email protected]> > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
