Although not a requirement, I have used corporate logos on my DoC's. They were not on letterhead but nonetheless the Logo/Trademark was on the DoC. I viewed it similarly to a CB Scheme Safety report that requires the Trademark and a copy of the marking plate to further assist in identifying the product and the manufacturer claiming compliance to the compulsory requirements. "EN45014 and ISO17050-1 both have the word "General" criteria or requirements in the title, so I will assume that means just that, general. One definition of General is: relating to the main or major parts of something rather than the details : not specific.
Mark -----Original Message----- From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PSES] Rejected Manufacturer Declarations Is EN45014 still applicable? Is ISO17050-1,-2 the correct ref? Another question - have been told by (Yet Another Import Authority) that these standards represent the minimum required information, and additional stuff not necessarily excluded. Comments? Brian - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
