Hello Ravinder,

I wasn't going to answer this as you were asking the experts ;)

Flip chips couple very well into their heatsinks compared to older wirebond 
packages as the silicon is much closer to the top surface. Perhaps try 
grounding/decoupling the heatsink or changing to a ceramic material for 
diagnosis of the problem?

Also, the package bond inductance will probably have reduced. You could look at 
increasing the decoupling, especially on any digital core and driver pins.

Has the manufacturer provided updated reference schematics for the new chip?

Rgds
James Pawson
EchoStar Europe

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 23 March 2014 01:39
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Higher EMI from ASIC built with new process


Hi Experts,

I am comparing EMI from two ASICs.  Both have identical rise/fall times and 
signal amplitude.  Yet the ASIC built with the later technology not only has 
significantly higher radiated emissions, but also shows much broader noise 
spectrum.  PCB stackup and layout is identical.  Please help me understand what 
other factors can be responsible for this anomaly.

The older ASIC uses a wirebond package, whereas the new ASIC has flip chip 
package.

Regards
Ravinder Ajmani
HGST, a Western Digital company
5601 Great Oaks Pkwy
San Jose, CA 95119-1003
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to