I think Jon means that the inductors would have a larger inductance; not
that they would have to handle more current.

Ken

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Kenny Products Company, LLC
55 Main Street                     Voice: (203)426-7166
Newtown, CT 06470                    Fax: (203)426-9138
http://www.MarkKenny.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter C.
Wallace
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:32 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Mesa m5i20 PWM frequency ?


On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Jon Elson wrote:

> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:26:55 -0600
> From: Jon Elson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>     <[email protected]>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Mesa m5i20 PWM frequency ?
>
> Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>
>> But whats the dead time? If you are not using a closed loop current
control,
>> (that is the controller PWM runs the HBridge directly) the dead time will
>> become a significant part of your 50 KHz cycle time leading to
non-linearity
>> in PWM versus motor voltage. At least that my experience, high PWM
results in
>> higher losses with no particular advantages (unless you are running a
motor
>> with inductive/mechanical time constants so fast that it matters --
perhaps a
>> voice coil)
>>
>>
> The internal dead time of the bridge driver is about 100 ns, but the
> opto-isolators
> are slow, so the minimum output pulse width is about 200 ns.  To make
> sure the
> bootstrap capacitors are kept charged, I require 200 ns off time (not
> exactly dead
> time, but close) between on pulses.
>
> The advantage of the higher PWM frequency is I avoid saturation of the
> output filter
> inductors.  Most cheap servo drives do not have an output filter, and
> there are many
> problems caused by that.  Most notably it can cause encoder errors,
> which can be
> a safety problem as well as just a major annoyance.  If I ran at a lower
> PWM frequency,
> then the filter components, especially the inductors, would have to be
> larger, as
> the maximum on-time would be longer.


Dont your output filter inductors always have to carry full motor current,
regardless of PWM rate?

(Well at a really low PWM rate you would have more motor current ripple so
the
peak current would be higher)

>
> Jon
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to