On Sunday 02 December 2007, Peter C. Wallace wrote:

>I do like the open loop idea of full force for 1/2 of the time and then
>reversing the the force (I've known people who drive like that)
>
>Also with the galvanometer, absolute angular accuracy is probably less
>important that repeatbility.
>
>For something frictionless, repeatable, having constant mass and no distrurb
>forces like a galvanometer, Feed forward will get you a long way, maybe even
>with a pre stored time based force profile. (HP was doing this on their 14"
>disk drive head positioners in the 70's)

So did Dynex in their version that TI used in their main frames, failing 
miserably though.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Oh, I get it!!  "The BEACH goes on", huh, SONNY??

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to