Kenneth Lerman wrote: > To the best of my knowledge, there has been no attempt to optimize the > performance of the interpreter. If there is strong feeling that this might > be a problem, I suspect that it could be improved significantly. > > My general experience with products that have never been optimized is that a > factor of two is generally easy. A factor of five or ten isn't unusual. I don't know if this is a problem. If a factor of five can be obtained with just a modern CPU, that would be over 100 blocks a second. I think that would compare quite favorably with commercial controls. I wish the guy that called me had left his number, so I could call him back with the results.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
