> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Wille Padnos [mailto:spad...@sover.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, 3 April 2010 11:54 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Hobbing
> 
> Andy Pugh wrote:
> > On 3 April 2010 01:07, Frank 
> Tkalcevic<fr...@franksworkshop.com.au>  wrote:
> >> G33 sounds more complicated.  Won't G33 have problems 
> requiring the 
> >> spindle turning under power, being "at-speed", and then 
> synching with index pulse?
> >>      
> > The spindle definitely does not need to be under power or 
> at-speed. I 
> > am not sure about the index pulse, but if it does then you 
> only have 
> > to turn it far enough to get an index then align the clock.
> >
> > I think G33.1 will wind back out (it is the tapping code) 
> but I am not 
> > sure it will reverse more than once. It's not hard to find 
> out though.
> >    
> I don't think so.  The rigid tapping code expects the spindle 
> to only go forward while it's tapping, and to only go 
> backward when it's retracting the tap.  The way 
> spindle-synched motion works at the moment, motion goes 
> forward as long as the spindle moves forward, motion stops if 
> the spindle stops or reverses, and forward motion will 
> continue when the spindle goes past its previous furthest 
> excursion.  So if you stop the spindle and turn it 1/4 turn 
> backwards, there will be no axis motion until you have moved 
> it past the point where you stopped it - 1/4 turn forward.  
> If you wiggle it back and forth, without ever passing that 
> mark, there will be no axis motion.
> 
> This is as I understand it, but I could be wrong.


Nope, you are exactly right.  On both accounts.  Turning the spindle by hand
will make Z move until it gets to the Z specified in G33/33.1 then stop.
G33.1 will move back, but only when it is within the G33.1 bounds.

I had a quick try at modifying my .hal file, and it worked, but I left a lot
of other things in there that made the axis fault if I turned it too far.  I
should be able to get that working, which will be fine for what I'm trying
to do.

Thanks,
Frank


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to