On 10 November 2010 13:22, Mark Wendt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay, I see I'm not being clear on what I'm trying to say here. I think you are being clear, but are answering the wrong question. However this is only my interpretation of the question, so it is equally likely that I am the one answering the wrong question (and I don't know how clear I am being). > C syntax knows that the && or || needs to be evaluated before the > conditional operator in the second expression to determine if the second > expression is even evaluated if the first expression is false. Yes, I am not disputing that. What I was saying was that operator precedence determines what the second expression of the && is, ie whether it is (new_in) or (new_in != start_in). At least, I rather hope that is the case... -- atp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
