Mark Wendt wrote: > On 11/10/2010 10:52 AM, Andy Pugh wrote: > >> On 10 November 2010 14:15, Mark Wendt<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> The compiler would see that first statement as a short circuit eval, and >>> always correctly evaluate it as your second form. >>> >>> >> How about: >> >> if(new_in&& new_in -= start_in) >> >> ? >> > Oops, slight boo-boo on the last reply. The second new_in would be > assigned the value of the decremented start_in and would be evaluated as > true if that value is greater than or equal to 1, and be evaluated as > false if that value is 0. > Non-zero, actually. A negative integer value is not false. (false == 0, true == !0) (AFAIK :) ) - Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
